Judicial Control of Ex Parte Contacts in Informal Rulemaking Judicial Control of Ex Parte Contacts in Informal Rulemaking Proceedings – Home Box Office v. Federal Communications Proceedings – Home Box Office v. Federal Communications Commission

by. Thomas Patterson A Federal Communications Commission administrator telephones an expert affiliated with an industry likely to be affected by a forthcoming agency regulation. The expert answers questions concerning data contained in the record which the administrator is reviewing prior to issuing the regulation. This ex parte conversation is quickly forgotten when the Commission promulgates its rule. Subsequently, a party disliking the new rule learns of the phone call and brings it to the attention of the reviewing court. Is

Read More »

Attorneys, the Internet, and Hate Speech: An Argument for an Amended Model Rule 8.4

By Jefferey Ogden Katz & Alexander I. Passo Since the invention of the internet, our lives have changed dramatically. Conveying ideas and information to broad audiences has become much simpler, as all types of ideas are now shared—including hateful ones targeted at minority groups. The internet is a bastion for hate speech within the United States. There are countless discriminatory posts circulated online daily, often by those who are meant to protect us. Unfortunately, attorneys frequently take part in this.

Read More »

Featured In