Legal Malpractice Case Considering Punitive Damages Argued in Illinois Supreme Court

Midwest Sanitary Service, Inc. v. Sandberg, Phoenix & Von Gontard, P.C. was just argued in the Illinois Supreme Court. The question presented on this Rule 308 appeal is:

“Does Illinois’ public policy on punitive damages and/or the statutory prohibition on punitive damages found in 735 ILCS 5/2-1115 bar recovery of incurred punitive damages in a legal malpractice case where the client alleges that, but for the negligence of the attorney in the underlying case, the jury in the underlying case would have returned a verdict awarding either no punitive damages or punitive damages in a lesser sum?”

Logic dictates that if a lawyer commits malpractice and causes his or her client to get hit with a verdict of $250,000 compensatory and $750,000 in punitive damages, the negligent attorney should be responsible for the harm caused to his or her client: $1,000,000. Both lower courts agreed with this analysis. Likewise, if a lawyer’s malpractice causes a client to lose a case in which $250,000 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages would have been won, the negligent lawyer should be responsible for the loss caused to his or her client: $1,000,000.

However, the issue is now before the Illinois Supreme Court.

If you have a question about legal malpractice, contact Thomas Patterson at tpatterson@pattersonlawfirm.com.

Share the Post:

Other Related Posts

Secure Your Business Interests

Complex legal matters can be overwhelming.

Navigating insurance claims, shareholder disputes, and commercial contracts without expert guidance can lead to unfavorable outcomes.

Let our seasoned attorneys handle your legal challenges.